The trolls eased into the holidays. A few frequent fliers stayed busy: Eclipse IP, Pragmatus and Clear With Computers.
As usual, I prepared the report in partnership with and using Docket Navigator and its powerful database. Docket Navigator is a valuable resource, and the place to go if you want to keep track of new patent litigation filings or want to know what is happening in a particular case, how your Judge has historically handled a particular type of motion, or a particular plaintiff’s litigation history.
Finally, please let me know if you have thoughts about the report or changes you would like to see. I am preparing it as a service for retailers and their supply chain who may want an overview of the patent litigation landscape. So, I am very open to ways to improve the report for you.
ArrivalStar SA et al v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc., (S.D. Fla.) (multiple cases).
Judge: District Judge James Lawrence King
Claim: Infringement
Defendants:
- Advance Auto Parts, Inc.
- Dewalt Industries, Inc.
- Edwin Watts Golf Shops, LLC.
- The Pep Boys-Manny
- Moe & Jack, Inc.
- Crocs, Inc.
- Golfsmith USA, LLC
- Billabong USA Holdings Party, Limited
- Killer Dana, Inc.
- Pacific Sunwear of California Inc.
- MIQ Global, LLC
- Ortec International USA, Inc.
- Aramex International
- McKesson Corporation
- Epes Transport System, Incorporated
Plaintiffs:
- ArrivalStar SA
- Melvino Technologies Limited
Pls. Cnsl: McMahon Law Firm
Patents: 6,904,359 (Notification systems and methods with user-definable notifications based upon occurance of events); 6,952,645 (System and method for activation of an advance notification system for monitoring and reporting status of vehicle travel); and 7,400,970 (System and method for an advance notification system for monitoring and reporting proximity of a vehicle).
Eclipse IP, LLC v. Wayfair, Inc., (N.D. Ill.).
Judge: District Judge Ronald A. Guzman
Claim: Infringement
Defendant: Wayfair, Inc.
Plaintiff: Eclipse IP, LLC
Pls. Cnsl: Wawrzyn
Patents: 7,119,716 (Response systems and methods for notification systems for modifying future notifications); 7,319,414 (Secure notification messaging systems and methods using authentication indicia); 7,482,952 (Response systems and methods for notification systems for modifying future notifications); and 7,876,239 (Secure notification messaging systems and methods using authentication indicia).
Select Retrieval, LLC v. Backcountry.com, Inc., (D. Del.) (multiple cases).
Claim: Infringement
Defendants:
- Backcountry.com, Inc.
- BodyBuilding.com, LLC
- LMC Right Start, Inc.
- MotoSport, Inc.
- Provide Commerce, Inc.
- QVC, Inc.
Plaintiff: Select Retrieval, LLC
Pls. Cnsl: Stamoulis & Weinblatt
Patent: 6,128,617 (Data display software with actions and links integrated with information).
Clear With Computers, LLC v. Hugo Boss Fashions, Inc., (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Judge: District Judge Leonard Davis
Claim: Infringement
Defendants:
- Hugo Boss Fashions, Inc.
- Tory Burch LLC
Plaintiff: Clear With Computers, LLC
Pls. Cnsl: Spangler & Fussell; and Stamoulis & Weinblatt
Patent: 8,266,015 (Inventory sales system and method).
PrivaCash, Inc. v. American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. et al, (E.D. Tex.).
Judge: District Judge Leonard Davis
Claim: Infringement
Defendants:
- American Express Prepaid Card Management Corporation
- American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc.
Plaintiff: PrivaCash, Inc.
Pls. Cnsl: Brooks Kushman; and Ward & Smith Law Firm
Patent: 8,219,474 (Method and system for distributing and activating a non-personalized purchase card).
Princeton Digital Image Corporation v. Harmonix Music Systems, Inc. et al, (D. Del.).
Claim: Infringement
Defendant:
- Electronic Arts, Inc.
- Harmonix Music Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff: Princeton Digital Image Corporation=
Pls. Cnsl: O’Kelly Ernst & Bielli
Patent: 5,513,129 (Method and system for controlling computer-generated virtual environment in response to audio signals).
Cascades Branding Innovation LLC v. OfficeMax Incorporated, (N.D. Ill.).
Judge: District Judge Charles P. Kocoras
Claim: Infringement
Defendant: OfficeMax Incorporated
Plaintiff: Cascades Branding Innovation LLC
Pls. Cnsl: Flachsbart & Greenspoon
Patents: 7,768,395 (Brand mapping); and 8,106,766 (Brand mapping).
Aeritas, LLC v. Virgin America Inc., (D. Del.; N.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Claim: Infringement
Defendants:
- Virgin America Inc.
- Cinemark USA, Inc.
Plaintiff: Aeritas, LLC
Pls. Cnsl: Bayard; Russ August & Kabat; and Law Office of David H Judson
Patents: 7,209,903 (Method and system for facilitation of wireless e-commerce transactions); 7,933,589 (Method and system for facilitation of wireless e-commerce transactions); 7,706,819 (Mixed-mode interaction); and 8,055,285 (Mixed-mode interaction).
Interface IP Holdings LLC v. AOL Inc., (D. Del.) (multiple cases).
Claim: Infringement
Defendants:
- AOL Inc.
- Avis Budget Group, Inc.
- CNN Interactive Group, Inc.
- Delta Airlines, Inc.
- E*Trade Financial Corporation
- Kayak Software Corporation
- Priceline.com Incorporated
- TripAdvisor LLC
- The Vanguard Group, Inc.
Plaintiff: Interface IP Holdings LLC
Pls. Cnsl: Black Chang & Hamill; and Farnan
Patents: 7,406,663 (Graphical input device with dynamic field width adjustment for input of variable data via a browser-based display); and 7,500,201 (Data input method and system with multi-sub-field matching of user entries into a graphical input device).
Lodsys Group, LLC v. Bed, Bath & Beyond, Inc. et al, (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Judge: District Judge Rodney Gilstrap
Claim: Infringement
Defendants:
- Bed, Bath & Beyond, Inc.
- Brooks Sports, Inc.
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- J&P Cycles, LLC
- B&H Foto & Electronics Corp.
- Charter Communications, Inc.
- Corbis Corporation
- Lamps Plus, Inc.
- Nordstrom, Inc.
Plaintiff: Lodsys Group, LLC
Pls. Cnsl: Kelley Goldfarb Gill Huck & Roth; and The Davis Firm
Patents: 7,222,078 (Methods and systems for gathering information from units of a commodity across a network); and 7,620,565 (Customer-based product design module).
Pragmatus Telecom, LLC v. 3M Company, (D. Del.) (multiple cases).
Claim: Infringement
Defendants:
- 3M Company
- Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc.
- Aramark Corporation
- AT&T, Inc.
- Bright House Networks, LLC
- Brother International Corporation
- CDW Corporation
- Comcast Corporation
- Comdata Corporation
- Crocs, Inc.
- Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company
- Frontier Communications Corporation
- General Motors Company
- HSN, Inc.
- Lands’ End Inc.
- Lenovo (United States) Inc.
- Lexmark International, Inc.
- NIKE, Inc.
- OCE-America, Inc.
- Office Depot, Inc.
- Oriental Trading Company, Inc.
- Redbox, Inc.
- Rite Aid Corporation
- Sprint Spectrum, LP
- Thomson Reuters US, Inc.
- U-Haul International, Inc.
- Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff: Pragmatus Telecom, LLC
Pls. Cnsl: Farnan; and Feinberg Day Alberti & Thompson
Patents: 6,311,231 (Method and system for coordinating data and voice communications via customer contract channel changing system using voice over IP); 6,668,286 (Method and system for coordinating data and voice communications via customer contact channel changing system over IP); and 7,159,043 (Method and system for coordinating data and voice communications via contact channel changing system).
LogMeIn, Inc. v. Pragmatus Telecom, LLC, (D. Del.).
Claim: Declaratory Judgment
Defendant: Pragmatus Telecom, LLC
Plaintiff: LogMeIn, Inc.
Pls. Cnsl: Choate Hall & Stewart; and Potter Anderson & Corroon
Patents: 5,884,032 (System for coordinating communications via customer contact channel changing system using call centre for setting up the call between customer and an available help agent); 6,311,231 (Method and system for coordinating data and voice communications via customer contract channel changing system using voice over IP); 6,668,286 (Method and system for coordinating data and voice communications via customer contact channel changing system over IP); and 7,159,043 (Method and system for coordinating data and voice communications via contact channel changing system).
LBS Innovations, LLC v. Alfred Angelo, Inc. et al, (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Claim: Infringement
Defendants:
- Alfred Angelo, Inc.
- Ben & Jerry’s Homemade Holdings, Inc.
- Denny’s, Inc. (d/b/a Denny’s Restaurants, Inc.)
- Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
- Pilot Travel Centers, LLC
- Randall’s Food & Drugs, LP
- Safeway, Inc.
- The Cheesecake Factory Restaurants, Inc.
Plaintiff: LBS Innovations, LLC
Pls. Cnsl: Buether Joe & Carpenter
Patent: 6,091,956 (Situation information system).
CreateAds LLC v. 1&1 Internet Inc., (D. Del.) (multiple cases).
Claim: Infringement
Defendants:
- 1&1 Internet Inc.
- Endurance International Group Holdings, LLC
- Hostgator.com, LLC
- Just Host, Inc.
- Hewlett-Packard Company
- Google Inc.
- Federal Express Corporation
- Intuit Inc.
- Squarespace, Inc.
- Staples, Inc.
- Vistaprint USA Inc.
- Network Solutions, LLC
- Register.com, Inc.
- Web.com Group, Inc.
- Yahoo! Inc.
Plaintiff: CreateAds LLC
Pls. Cnsl: Bayard; and Russ August & Kabat
Patent: 5,535,320 (Method of generating a visual design).